![Keep Us Strong](/static/gfx/ja-cg.jpg)
![WikiLeaks logo](/static/gfx/WL_Hour_Glass_small.png)
Currently released so far... 5422 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
AE
AJ
ASEC
AMGT
AR
AU
AG
AS
AM
AORC
AFIN
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AL
AEMR
ACOA
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AVERY
APCS
AER
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AEC
APECO
AGMT
CH
CASC
CA
CD
CV
CVIS
CMGT
CO
CI
CU
CBW
CLINTON
CE
CJAN
CIA
CG
CF
CN
CS
CAN
COUNTER
CDG
CIS
CM
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CJUS
CARSON
CL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CACM
CDB
EPET
EINV
ECON
ENRG
EAID
ETRD
EG
ETTC
EFIN
EU
EAGR
ELAB
EIND
EUN
EAIR
ER
ECIN
ECPS
EFIS
EI
EINT
EZ
EMIN
ET
EC
ECONEFIN
ENVR
ES
ECA
ELN
EN
EFTA
EWWT
ELTN
EXTERNAL
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
EK
ENGY
ETRO
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ENVI
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
IR
IZ
IS
IT
INTERPOL
IPR
IN
INRB
IAEA
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
ITPHUM
IV
IWC
IQ
ICTY
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
ICAO
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
INR
IRC
ITALY
ITALIAN
KCOR
KZ
KDEM
KN
KNNP
KPAL
KU
KWBG
KCRM
KE
KISL
KAWK
KSCA
KS
KSPR
KJUS
KFRD
KTIP
KPAO
KTFN
KIPR
KPKO
KNUC
KMDR
KGHG
KPLS
KOLY
KUNR
KDRG
KIRF
KIRC
KBIO
KHLS
KG
KACT
KGIC
KRAD
KCOM
KMCA
KV
KHDP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KMPI
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMC
KTLA
KCFC
KTIA
KHIV
KPRP
KAWC
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KTDB
KMRS
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KO
KTER
KSUM
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KSTH
KREL
KNSD
KTEX
KPAI
KHSA
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KGCC
KPIN
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MTCRE
MX
MCAP
MO
MNUC
ML
MR
MZ
MPOS
MOPPS
MTCR
MAPP
MU
MY
MA
MG
MASC
MCC
MEPP
MK
MTRE
MP
MIL
MDC
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MASSMNUC
MERCOSUR
MC
ODIP
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OEXC
OPRC
OFDP
OPDC
OTRA
OSCE
OAS
OPIC
OECD
OPCW
OSCI
OIE
OIC
OTR
OVP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
PGOV
PINR
PREL
PTER
PK
PHUM
PE
PARM
PBIO
PINS
PREF
PSOE
PBTS
PL
PHSA
PKFK
PO
PGOF
PROP
PA
PARMS
PORG
PM
PMIL
PTERE
POL
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRGOV
PNAT
PROV
PEL
PINF
PGOVE
POLINT
PRL
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PHUS
PHUMPREL
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PECON
POGOV
PINL
SCUL
SA
SY
SP
SNAR
SENV
SU
SW
SOCI
SL
SG
SMIG
SO
SF
SR
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
SNARCS
STEINBERG
TX
TW
TU
TSPA
TH
TIP
TI
TS
TBIO
TRGY
TC
TR
TT
TERRORISM
TO
TFIN
TD
TSPL
TZ
TPHY
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TP
UK
UG
UP
UV
US
UN
UNSC
UNGA
USEU
USUN
UY
UZ
UNO
UNMIK
UNESCO
UE
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE2008, THE PROCESS OF RATIFYING FTAs IN COSTA RICA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE2008.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SAN JOSE 002008
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
WHA/CEN
EB FOR WCRAFT, BLAMPRON
E FOR DEDWARDS
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS, LGUMBINER
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR RVARGO, NMOORJANI, AMALITO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS
SUBJECT: THE PROCESS OF RATIFYING FTAs IN COSTA RICA
¶1. (SBU) Summary. The process to ratify free trade
agreements such as the United States-Central American-
Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) in Costa
Rica is not simple. It is not even clear whether the
agreement must be passed by a simple or a two-thirds
majority. The Assembly members (deputies) will have to
vote at least twice on the agreement -- once before and
once after the Constitutional Court reviews it for any
potential conflicts with the Costa Rican constitution. The
entire process will take at least 6 months and possibly
much longer, and the process can begin only after President
Pacheco sends the treaty to the Legislative Assembly. Post
is hopeful that that will occur this calendar year, but the
President has not made a decision yet. End Summary.
----------------------------
SIX FTAs DOWN AND ONE TO GO
----------------------------
¶2. (U) The GOCR, with the Ministry of Foreign Trade (COMEX)
as the lead governmental organization, has negotiated and
the Assembly has approved five FTAs already: Mexico in
1995, Canada in 2001, Chile and the Dominican Republic in
2002, and most recently CARICOM, a group of 12 Caribbean
nations comprising Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Belize,
Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis,
Saint Lucia, St. Vincents and the Grenadines, Suriname, and
Trinidad and Tobago. (Note: In 1973, prior to COMEX's
existence, the GOCR ratified an FTA with Panama.) As an
example of the process, COMEX started negotiations with
CARICOM on October 22, 2002, and ended on March 14, 2003.
After President Pacheco signed the agreement on March 9,
2004, the agreement was sent to the Assembly where it was
referred to the International Relations and Foreign Trade
Commission for study. After voting to send the agreement
for a vote on the Assembly floor, the Assembly approved the
FTA in its first debate on the issue on May 9, 2004.
¶3. (U) As required by law, the Constitutional Court
reviews all international agreements, including FTAs, to
check that all procedural requirements are met and that
there are no potential conflicts with the Costa Rican
constitution. After finding no significant issue with
respect to the agreement with CARICOM, the FTA, by law, had
to be voted on a second time. On August 9, 2005, 41 of the
48 members present in the Costa Rican Legislative Assembly
voted final approval of the FTA with CARICOM. The second
vote occurred approximately one year after the Assembly
first started discussions on this issue. The agreement was
signed by President Pacheco on August 23, 2005, and will be
published in the official government gazette, after which
the FTA will be considered officially ratified.
---------------------------------
A POSSIBLE TIMETABLE FOR CAFTA-DR
---------------------------------
¶4. (U) Currently Costa Rica remains the only signatory
country of CAFTA-DR that has not already sent the agreement
to its legislature. The Administration is waiting for "the
appropriate time" to send it for ratification. Assembly
President Gerardo Gonzalez from the President's Social
Christian Unity Party (PUSC) is still pursuing the
acceptability of a deputy submitting CAFTA-DR to the
Assembly if the President will not. COMMENT: Most
constitutional experts believe that only the President is
permitted to submit an international agreement such as
CAFTA-DR to the Assembly for ratification. END COMMENT.
¶5. (SBU) The Constitutional Court finds problems with many
bills it reviews and in that likely case would send its
comments on potential conflicts to the Assembly for
correction. If there are significant issues, the agreement
may be sent back to the International Relations and Foreign
Trade Commission to study the Court's comments and to
implement corrective changes, if possible. With respect to
CAFTA-DR, Assembly staff sources told Econoff that the
President of the International Relations and Foreign Trade
Commission Rolando Lacle (PUSC) has primed the process by
discussing conduct of the review with Commission members.
The first vote is expected in approximately three to four
months, followed by an at least one-month review by the
Constitutional Court. In a best-case scenario, a second
vote would be held approximately four to five months after
CAFTA-DR is introduced in the Assembly. (Note: In the case
of the CARICOM FTA, which was not contentious, 16 months
elapsed between the first vote in the Assembly and the
agreement coming into force. Many Costa Ricans estimate
that 6-8 months of debate may be needed for CAFTA-DR before
the first vote.)
--------------------------------------------- ----
SIMPLE MAJORITY OR TWO-THIRDS TO PASS CAFTA-DR?
--------------------------------------------- ----
¶6. (SBU) There still exists a question as to whether a
simple majority or two-thirds majority is required to pass
CAFTA-DR. The prevailing opinion from many sources is that
only a simple majority (half plus one) is necessary in each
of the two Assembly votes to approve CAFTA-DR. However,
there are some political experts who believe that a two-
thirds majority will be necessary. Based on information
provided by a former COMEX official and Legislative
Assembly staff members, all previous FTAs were passed by
more than a two-thirds vote, although the stated
requirement was only a simple majority. During the most
recent FTA vote, Assembly President Gerardo Gonzalez issued
a ruling stating that the approval of the CARICOM FTA
required only a simple majority.
¶7. (SBU) The Constitutional Court reviewed the case and
did not take issue with his ruling. FTAs may vary in the
breadth and detail of the texts. It appears that the issue
regarding how many votes will be needed to pass CAFTA-DR
remains unclear. A former COMEX official stated that the
investment-related portions of CAFTA-DR may be an aspect
that could lead one to believe that a two-thirds majority
is required. COMMENT: Based on information available to
Post, there may be enough support for CAFTA-DR in the
current Assembly to pass the agreement even if a two-thirds
majority is required, especially if most of the PUSC,
National Liberation Party (PLN), and Libertarian Movement
Party (ML) deputies vote in favor of CAFTA-DR, as they
currently say they will. END COMMENT.
¶8. (SBU) Legislative Assembly staff members insist that
only a simple majority is required for CAFTA-DR approval
and cite the most recent FTA with CARICOM as an example.
Based on information provided by these sources, a review of
a minimum of three to four months until the first vote is
expected. The Constitutional Court review will take at
least one month, followed by the second vote or, in the
case of finding significant issues, perhaps another lengthy
review process.
¶9. (SBU) Proponents of requiring a two-thirds majority to
pass CAFTA-DR refer to a much-disputed 1993 Constitutional
Court ruling involving the World Bank's International
Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The
Constitutional Court stated that due to the ceding of
control of legal remedies to a supra-national body, a two-
thirds majority was required. However, according to a
former COMEX official, this ruling appears to be based on
an obscure 1960 change to the constitution that was passed
to discourage closer ties with other Central American
countries. The Constitutional Court's decision in that
case seems not to have been based on precedent and has not
been repeated during the review of numerous other
international agreements, such as joining the World Trade
Organization, in which Costa Rica ceded far broader
jurisdiction on commercial disputes than is contemplated
under CAFTA-DR.
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶10. (SBU) The Legislative Assembly's history regarding the
length of time it takes to approve an FTA does not bode
well for a rapid approval of CAFTA-DR. The Assembly took
approximately 18 months to approve the most recent FTA with
CARICOM. Post believes that the process to approve CAFTA-
DR, once it is in the Assembly's hands, will take at least
six months. Complicating the CAFTA-DR approval process are
the Presidential and Legislative elections that will be
held in February 2006. The President and entire Assembly
will be replaced in May 2006 as consecutive terms are not
permitted under Costa Rica's constitution.
FRISBIE