Currently released so far... 5422 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
AE
AJ
ASEC
AMGT
AR
AU
AG
AS
AM
AORC
AFIN
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AL
AEMR
ACOA
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AVERY
APCS
AER
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AEC
APECO
AGMT
CH
CASC
CA
CD
CV
CVIS
CMGT
CO
CI
CU
CBW
CLINTON
CE
CJAN
CIA
CG
CF
CN
CS
CAN
COUNTER
CDG
CIS
CM
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CJUS
CARSON
CL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CACM
CDB
EPET
EINV
ECON
ENRG
EAID
ETRD
EG
ETTC
EFIN
EU
EAGR
ELAB
EIND
EUN
EAIR
ER
ECIN
ECPS
EFIS
EI
EINT
EZ
EMIN
ET
EC
ECONEFIN
ENVR
ES
ECA
ELN
EN
EFTA
EWWT
ELTN
EXTERNAL
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
EK
ENGY
ETRO
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ENVI
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
IR
IZ
IS
IT
INTERPOL
IPR
IN
INRB
IAEA
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
ITPHUM
IV
IWC
IQ
ICTY
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
ICAO
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
INR
IRC
ITALY
ITALIAN
KCOR
KZ
KDEM
KN
KNNP
KPAL
KU
KWBG
KCRM
KE
KISL
KAWK
KSCA
KS
KSPR
KJUS
KFRD
KTIP
KPAO
KTFN
KIPR
KPKO
KNUC
KMDR
KGHG
KPLS
KOLY
KUNR
KDRG
KIRF
KIRC
KBIO
KHLS
KG
KACT
KGIC
KRAD
KCOM
KMCA
KV
KHDP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KMPI
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMC
KTLA
KCFC
KTIA
KHIV
KPRP
KAWC
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KTDB
KMRS
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KO
KTER
KSUM
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KSTH
KREL
KNSD
KTEX
KPAI
KHSA
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KGCC
KPIN
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MTCRE
MX
MCAP
MO
MNUC
ML
MR
MZ
MPOS
MOPPS
MTCR
MAPP
MU
MY
MA
MG
MASC
MCC
MEPP
MK
MTRE
MP
MIL
MDC
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MASSMNUC
MERCOSUR
MC
ODIP
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OEXC
OPRC
OFDP
OPDC
OTRA
OSCE
OAS
OPIC
OECD
OPCW
OSCI
OIE
OIC
OTR
OVP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
PGOV
PINR
PREL
PTER
PK
PHUM
PE
PARM
PBIO
PINS
PREF
PSOE
PBTS
PL
PHSA
PKFK
PO
PGOF
PROP
PA
PARMS
PORG
PM
PMIL
PTERE
POL
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRGOV
PNAT
PROV
PEL
PINF
PGOVE
POLINT
PRL
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PHUS
PHUMPREL
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PECON
POGOV
PINL
SCUL
SA
SY
SP
SNAR
SENV
SU
SW
SOCI
SL
SG
SMIG
SO
SF
SR
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
SNARCS
STEINBERG
TX
TW
TU
TSPA
TH
TIP
TI
TS
TBIO
TRGY
TC
TR
TT
TERRORISM
TO
TFIN
TD
TSPL
TZ
TPHY
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TP
UK
UG
UP
UV
US
UN
UNSC
UNGA
USEU
USUN
UY
UZ
UNO
UNMIK
UNESCO
UE
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 08SANJOSE823, COSTA RICA STAGGERS INTO SECOND CAFTA EXTENSION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08SANJOSE823.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
08SANJOSE823 | 2008-10-15 22:10 | 2011-03-02 16:04 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy San Jose |
Appears in these articles: http://www.nacion.com/2011-03-02/Investigacion.aspx |
VZCZCXYZ0001
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0823/01 2892243
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 152243Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0187
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHDG/AMEMBASSY SANTO DOMINGO IMMEDIATE 1602
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SAN JOSE 000823
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC AND EEB; PLEASE PASS TO
USTR AMALITO AND DOLIVER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/15/2018
TAGS: CS ECON ETRD PGOV PINR PREL
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA STAGGERS INTO SECOND CAFTA EXTENSION
REF: A. A) SAN JOSE 745
¶B. B) SAN JOSE 774
Classified By: POL/ECON Counselor David E. Henifin per 1.4 (d)
=======
SUMMARY
=======
¶1. (SBU) Implementing CAFTA continues to challenge the GOCR.
The Constitutional Court's September 11 ruling that a portion
of the 13th CAFTA bill was unconstitutional (Reftels), plus
lingering technical issues in intellectual property (IP),
triggered a second entry-into-force (EIF) extension request
to Costa Rica,s CAFTA partners. The partners granted the
extension on September 30, specifying a new EIF date of
January 1. Also on September 30, President Arias asked
visiting Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez to deliver a
proposal to USTR requesting EIF for the GOCR as soon as the
13th bill has been modified per the Court,s ruling and
signed into law, regardless of the status of other
outstanding issues. (This echoed Arias's request in a letter
to POTUS on September 19.)
¶2. (SBU) Even with this latest extension, the GOCR has its
work cut out for it. The 13th law likely faces another,
opposition-driven review by the Constitutional Court. The
four outstanding IP issues may require a new, 14th CAFTA
bill. Also, the Arias administration must finalize
CAFTA-related regulations, and launch a special intellectual
property rights (IPR) enforcement office. Even under the
best case scenario (in which a 14th law is not required), the
GOCR may not complete all its remaining CAFTA tasks before
January 1. END SUMMARY.
=========================
INTO A SECOND OVERTIME . . .
=========================
¶3. (SBU) Further to Ref B, during the third week of
September, Foreign Trade (COMEX) Minister Marco Vinicio Ruiz
formally requested an EIF extension from USTR. USTR and
partner CAFTA countries agreed to an extension until January
1, 2009, with Washington-based COMs signing the prerequisite
letter on September 30. (Nicaragua required special
attention and did not sign until 19:45 Washington time).
According to USTR, the GOCR expressed "a great political
need" for a formalized extension process, no doubt a) to keep
the pressure on the weary Arias administration and its
fraying pro-CAFTA coalition in the legislature and b) to
avoid buttressing the long-held view of the anti-CAFTA
opposition that an EIF extension was never technically
required (thus leaving time to renegotiate to "soften" some
of the alleged impacts of CAFTA).
===========================
. . . WHILE FIGHTING ON THREE FRONTS
===========================
¶4. (U) The GOCR clearly needs the extra time, first to
respond to the controversial Constitutional Court decision.
The Court found one section of the 13th bill (the IPR
catch-all bill) to be unconstitutional because the GOCR did
not consult with Costa Rica,s indigenous communities, in
compliance with ILO Convention 169, regarding CAFTA-generated
changes in the existing biodiversity law that could affect
those communities.
¶5. (SBU) The national legislature is to begin debate the week
of October 13 on a modified bill, which stripped out the
section the Court found objectionable. This should de-couple
the indigenous consultation issue from CAFTA EIF. However,
the PAC-led opposition, emboldened by the latest delay and
seeing one last opportunity to block CAFTA, has already
called for a Court review of the "fixed" law. The GOCR hopes
the bill will be approved in first reading and passed to the
Court for action by the week of October 20.
¶6. (SBU) VM Roberto Thompson, who is managing the process
for the Presidencia, was cautiously optimistic when we met
with him on October 14. The Constitutional Court has given
informal signals that it will complete its review well before
the 30 days allotted, and will not raise new concerns about
the modified law.
¶7. (SBU) Thompson acknowledged, however, that some potential
roadblocks remain. The national Human Rights Ombudswoman, a
well-known CAFTA opponent, has the right to ask for
Constitutional Court review of any law and is apparently
mulling this over for the 13th CAFTA bill. Also, the
behavior of the Court, despite the GOCR,s optimism, cannot
be guaranteed in advance. With erstwhile pro-CAFTA allies in
the Libertarian Party join the PAC in stubbornly decrying the
incorrect procedures used by the GOCR to correct the 13th
law, their vote is not 100 percent assured, either. Even
with those risks, Thompson predicted the bill should be
reviewed by the Court, approved by the legislature in second
reading, and signed into law in November, at the latest.
=================
ATTACK ON THE PAC
=================
¶8. (SBU) In anticipation of the second Court review, the
worried private sector resumed its media campaign against the
PAC for once again delaying CAFTA implementation and ignoring
the will of the people as expressed by the 2007 referendum
ratifying CAFTA. AmCham contacts told us they wanted PAC to
"pay the full political cost" for the continued delays, and
they hoped the ads would moderate that party,s
obstructionism, as a similar campaign did earlier this year.
Six different ads ran on TV and radio the week of October 6,
accompanied by full page newspaper ads. 3500 textile workers
also petitioned the GOCR to implement CAFTA quickly to
protect their jobs.
¶9. (U) The ads seem to have found their mark. In a press
conference on October 14, PAC leader Otton Solis furiously
insisted that the GOCR, and not his party, should be blamed
for any CAFTA delays, and alleged (outrageously) that "dirty
narcotrafficking money" had funded the ads against his party.
In addition, the pro-CAFTA coalition is hoping the campaign
may also remind the court of the political fallout that would
ensue if CAFTA EIF were blocked.
=========================
SECOND FRONT: TECHNICAL ISSUES, . . .
=========================
¶10. (SBU) In addition, the GOCR must address four remaining
IP issues, which although seemingly small, are legally
material and thus essential to CAFTA compliance. The IP
enforcement bill (signed into law in August) is missing one
word ("performance") which effects the definition of
criminality. In the trouble-plagued IPR catch-all bill,
there are three instances where a word was added which
materially changed the meaning and harmed copyright and data
protection IP concepts. USTR believes a new 14th "technical
corrections" bill is the only way to make these necessary
changes.
¶11. (SBU) Under other circumstances in other FTA
negotiations, such a seemingly simple piece of legislation
would be an easy fix, but the political and institutional
situation is different in Costa Rica at this time. GOCR
officials, including Legislature President Francisco Pacheco,
VM Amparo Pacheco (COMEX) and VM Thompson (Presidencia), as
well as key private sector contacts, are confident they can
squeeze "one more vote" out of the cumbersome, 38-seat
pro-CAFTA coalition, but that,s it. This last vote would be
to approve the "fixed" 13th bill, assuming the Constitutional
Court finds no new problems. (Any item of legislation must
be approved by two plenary votes in Costa Rica to become
law.)
=========================
. . . AND ONE LAW TOO MANY?
=========================
¶12. (SBU) Our contacts are highly pessimistic about the
prospects of new CAFTA-related legislation, however. A
technical corrections bill would not be introduced until
December, they tell us, once the annual budget is approved
(since this takes precedence over all other legislative
action in November) and once the executive branch can again
set the legislative agenda (it can do so in the
December-April extraordinary session). Given the deep-seated
CAFTA fatigue in the legislature, swift action on this last
bill is not assured. As Thompson explained, 38 votes would
again be needed to limit debate on such a bill, otherwise
discussion could be endless.
¶13. (SBU) Our interlocutors also worry that any new
CAFTA-related bill risks giving more ammunition to the
anti-CAFTA opposition. PAC party leader (and presidential
candidate) Solis, in a letter passed to the Embassy during
Secretary Gutierrez's visit, has already called for the IPR
catch-all bill to be removed from the CAFTA implementation
package entirely (which is a non-starter), alleging that the
USG used delays in the implementation process to "place new
demands "on Costa Rica. Solis also insisted (again) that
CAFTA be re-negotiated with Costa Rica.
¶14. (SBU) Introducing a new, 14th bill does risk making the
USG the issue, since it would fuel Solis,s and other CAFTA
opponents' arguments that the USG added one more CAFTA
requirement "at the last minute." With the early political
maneuvering in full swing for the 2009-2010 election
campaign, and with the Arias administration down in the polls
and feeling against the ropes, GOCR officials and pro-CAFTA
legislators fear that even technical corrections legislation
would be a bill too far. Best case: completing work on such
a bill probably would delay EIF into the new year.
========================
THE "SIDE LETTER" GAMBIT
========================
¶15. (SBU) Given the GOCR,s strong aversion to introducing
and processing another CAFTA bill, Arias used Commerce
Secretary Gutierrez,s visit to propose an alternate course
of action, which, if accepted, would permit Costa Rica,s
CAFTA EIF on January 1 (or as soon as the 13th bill becomes
law), regardless of progress on the other issues. The GOCR
would pledge to complete any remaining issues as soon as
possible after January 1, in a side letter signed by
President Arias himself, if that were necessary. In the
GOCR,s (accurate) calculus, EIF would make Solis,s and the
opposition,s arguments moot.
========================
THIRD FRONT: IPR ENFORCEMENT
========================
¶16. (SBU) The GOCR's third front is fulfilling the handshake
agreement with USTR to create a special enforcement office
(SEO) to enforce IP law and prosecute IP crimes. As
explained to Ambassador Cianchette and DCM Brennan in early
August by COMEX Minister Ruiz, the GOCR,s Fiscal General,
Francisco Dall'Anese, must request the authorization of the
funds for the SEO from the Corte Plena, the full 22-member
Supreme Court.
¶17. (SBU) Since then, the Arias administration and President
of the Supreme Court Luis Paulino Mora have acknowledged to
us the importance of launching the SEO, and Dall'Anese and
then-Minister of Justice Laura Chinchilla exchanged letters
on the topic. Progress has been slow, however. The Fiscal
General's most recent letter named a prosecutor, a location
of the office, and responsibilities by citing articles from
IP law, but the SEO does not yet have a budget, office or
staff.
¶18. (SBU) We are continuing our pressure, enlisting a number
of private sector allies and lower-level GOCR officials who
well understand the need for, and importance of, effective
IPR enforcement, not only for CAFTA, but also for TRIPS and
Special 301 compliance. Thompson told us October 14 that he
would push again for a proper budget and staff for the new
SEO.
=======================
REGULATIONS MOVING, AT LEAST
=======================
¶19. (SBU) The Costa Rican Embassy in Washington has provided
one piece of good news, at least. The GOCR will soon
finalize the remaining CAFTA-related regulations on
telecommunications, and the new regulatory body, SUTEL,
should staff its board by October 31.
=======
COMMENT
=======
¶20. (SBU) We provide this context as an explanation, not an
excuse. Renewed GOCR leadership and private sector pressure
should keep CAFTA from derailing in Costa Rica at the last
minute. Although more grouchy than inspirational, President
Arias has been slightly more vocal recently in pressing PAC
and the anti-CAFTA opposition to respect the will of the
people and get CAFTA done.
¶21. (SBU) The latest extension is not all bad. Although due
mostly to the Court,s rejection of the 13th bill, it has
given both sides more time to work out the final thorny
technical issues, and it has avoided the politically
problematic scenario of the GOCR seeming to have completed
all its EIF work by the earlier October 1 deadline, only to
have the USG appear to "deny" CAFTA compliance certification
because of a few outstanding issues.
¶22. (C) Leadership, pressure and time may not be enough to
ensure Costa Rica,s CAFTA EIF, however. Although the USG
has shown considerable flexibility through this long and
torturous saga, a little more may be required, in particular
given CAFTA's importance to USG policy in the region in
general, and on trade, in particular. If Arias's proposal is
not accepted, for example, and a 14th CAFTA bill is required,
then we do not expect to see Costa Rican EIF until early
2009, and perhaps later. This might give PAC leader Solis
and other CAFTA opponents the last chance they seek to push
Costa Rica's EIF into the next U.S. administration, during
which they still believe they may be able to "get a better
deal" on CAFTA for Costa Rica. Such a notion may be totally
misguided, but combined with a tired, deflated Arias
administration and the many "veto points" built into the
hyper-legalistic Costa Rican political system, Solis and the
anti-CAFTA forces still have weapons to deploy.
CIANCHETTE